vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.6× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -0.7%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -4.4%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
CLMB vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $123.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $7.0M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 89.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $271.7M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $665.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $21.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
