vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.3M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.9× Nano Dimension Ltd.). Clean Energy Fuels Corp. runs the higher net margin — -38.3% vs -171.1%, a 132.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.5M vs $-21.1M).
Bloom Energy is an American public company that designs and manufactures solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) which independently produce electricity onsite for power generation in data centers, manufacturing, and other commercial sectors. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Jose, California; its fuel cell technology generates electricity through a chemical conversion process, which differs from most other power sources reliant on combustion, and can use natural gas, biogas or hydrogen as fuel...
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
CLNE vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.3M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $-43.0M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.5% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | -38.3% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.3M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $103.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-43.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-135.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.2M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.3M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -121.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -38.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -130.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.1M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $226.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.4M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $156.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $232.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.5M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $249.3M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $226.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $559.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $590.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $596.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.3M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $724.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $723.0M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $722.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.1M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.5M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.8% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.9M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLNE
| Volume Related Fuel Sales | $73.6M | 66% |
| Services | $15.1M | 13% |
| Station Construction Sales | $10.7M | 9% |
| Volume Related Renewable Identification Number Credits | $9.5M | 8% |
| Volume Related Low Carbon Fuel Standard Credits | $3.4M | 3% |
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
