vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $181.2M, roughly 1.1× CLEANSPARK, INC.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -209.0%, a 211.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEANSPARK, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs 5.2%). ROGERS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-198.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs -3.3%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
CLSK vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
