vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLARIVATE PLC (CLVT) and G III APPAREL GROUP LTD (GIII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
G III APPAREL GROUP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($988.6M vs $585.5M, roughly 1.7× CLARIVATE PLC). G III APPAREL GROUP LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -6.9%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLARIVATE PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -9.0%). CLARIVATE PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($78.9M vs $-106.4M). Over the past eight quarters, G III APPAREL GROUP LTD's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -5.1%).
Clarivate Plc is a British-American publicly traded analytics company that operates a collection of subscription-based services, in the areas of bibliometrics and scientometrics; business and market intelligence, and competitive profiling for pharmacy and biotech, patents, and regulatory compliance; trademark protection, and domain and brand protection. Clarivate calculates the impact factor of scientific journals, using data from its Web of Science product family, that also includes services...
G III Apparel Group is a global fashion company that designs, sources, manufactures, markets and distributes apparel, footwear, and accessories under a range of owned and licensed well-known brands. It serves department stores, specialty retailers, and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe, and other key global markets, catering to casual, sportswear, and premium fashion consumer segments.
CLVT vs GIII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $585.5M | $988.6M |
| Net Profit | $-40.2M | $80.6M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | -6.9% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.3% | -29.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $585.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $617.0M | $988.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $623.1M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $621.4M | $583.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $593.7M | $839.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $663.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $622.2M | $644.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.3M | $609.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-40.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.0M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-103.9M | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-191.8M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.6M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-304.3M | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | 67.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.8% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.0% | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.1% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.7% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.2% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.2% | 42.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.9% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.8% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $1.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.27 | $2.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.46 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $184.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.3B | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.89× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $329.2M | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.7M | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $362.6M | $257.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.0M | $181.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.2M | $104.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.5M | $414.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.4M | $508.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $213.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $402.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $402.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.89× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.90× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.84× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | 0.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $134.7M | $-97.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.9M | $-106.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.5% | -10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.5% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $333.9M | $367.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $134.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $159.9M | $-97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.3M | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.2M | $333.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.3M | $-111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.2M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | $78.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $89.2M | $-106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.5M | $64.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $323.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.3M | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.3M | $32.8M |
| Q1 26 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | -11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.58× | -1.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLVT
| Subscription | $397.5M | 68% |
| Re-occurring | $108.6M | 19% |
| Transactional | $79.4M | 14% |
GIII
| Proprietary Brands | $498.1M | 50% |
| Licensed Brands | $479.2M | 48% |
| Retail Segment | $45.7M | 5% |
