vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLARIVATE PLC (CLVT) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $585.5M, roughly 1.8× CLARIVATE PLC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -6.9%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLARIVATE PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -2.5%). CLARIVATE PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($78.9M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -5.1%).
Clarivate Plc is a British-American publicly traded analytics company that operates a collection of subscription-based services, in the areas of bibliometrics and scientometrics; business and market intelligence, and competitive profiling for pharmacy and biotech, patents, and regulatory compliance; trademark protection, and domain and brand protection. Clarivate calculates the impact factor of scientific journals, using data from its Web of Science product family, that also includes services...
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
CLVT vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $585.5M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-40.2M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | -6.9% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.3% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $585.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $617.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $623.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $621.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $593.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $663.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $622.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.3M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $-40.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.3M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-103.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-191.8M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.6M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-304.3M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 67.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.7% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.2% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.9% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.27 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.46 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.3B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.89× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $329.2M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.7M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $362.6M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.0M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.2M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.5M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.4M | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.89× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $134.7M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.9M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.5% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.5% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $333.9M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $134.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $159.9M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.3M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.2M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.3M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.9M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.2M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | $78.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $89.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.5M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.3M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.3M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.58× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLVT
| Subscription | $397.5M | 68% |
| Re-occurring | $108.6M | 19% |
| Transactional | $79.4M | 14% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
