vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and CMB.TECH NV (CMBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $592.8M, roughly 1.4× CMB.TECH NV). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 21.0%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMERICA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -34.6%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
CMA vs CMBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $592.8M |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $191.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 46.4% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 32.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | -34.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | -63.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $592.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $784.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $192.0M | $905.9M |
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $191.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $33.0M | $521.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 63.4% |
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 17.2% | 57.5% |
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.20 | $2.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $38.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 2.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $429.4M |
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.2B | $930.7M |
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.4B | $2.4B |
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.4B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $85.8B | $3.4B |
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.97× | 0.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | $204.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $204.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.1B | $435.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $65.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 7.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 40.9% |
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 34.00× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
