vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and HECLA MINING CO (HL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $448.1M, roughly 1.9× HECLA MINING CO). HECLA MINING CO runs the higher net margin — 30.0% vs 21.0%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HECLA MINING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.5% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 53.8%).

Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.

Hecla Mining is a leading U.S.-based precious and base metals mining firm. Core products include silver, gold, lead and zinc, with operating assets across North America. It supplies raw materials to global jewelry manufacturing, industrial production, and renewable energy segments, and is a top domestic primary silver producer.

CMA vs HL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CMA
CMA
1.9× larger
CMA
$838.0M
$448.1M
HL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HL
HL
+76.2% gap
HL
79.5%
3.3%
CMA
Higher net margin
HL
HL
9.0% more per $
HL
30.0%
21.0%
CMA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CMA
CMA
Annualised
CMA
108.9%
53.8%
HL

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Revenue
$838.0M
$448.1M
Net Profit
$176.0M
$134.4M
Gross Margin
55.4%
Operating Margin
49.1%
Net Margin
21.0%
30.0%
Revenue YoY
3.3%
79.5%
Net Profit YoY
-4.3%
1027.2%
EPS (diluted)
$1.35
$0.20

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$448.1M
Q3 25
$838.0M
$409.5M
Q2 25
$849.0M
$304.0M
Q1 25
$829.0M
$261.3M
Q4 24
$825.0M
$249.7M
Q3 24
$811.0M
$245.1M
Q2 24
$824.0M
$245.7M
Q1 24
$784.0M
$189.5M
Net Profit
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$134.4M
Q3 25
$176.0M
$100.7M
Q2 25
$199.0M
$57.7M
Q1 25
$172.0M
$28.9M
Q4 24
$170.0M
$11.9M
Q3 24
$184.0M
$1.8M
Q2 24
$206.0M
$27.9M
Q1 24
$138.0M
$-5.8M
Gross Margin
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
55.4%
Q3 25
44.1%
Q2 25
39.3%
Q1 25
28.3%
Q4 24
27.4%
Q3 24
24.2%
Q2 24
20.9%
Q1 24
10.1%
Operating Margin
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
49.1%
Q3 25
36.3%
Q2 25
30.8%
Q1 25
20.0%
Q4 24
15.3%
Q3 24
9.2%
Q2 24
16.5%
Q1 24
2.7%
Net Margin
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
30.0%
Q3 25
21.0%
24.6%
Q2 25
23.4%
19.0%
Q1 25
20.7%
11.0%
Q4 24
20.6%
4.8%
Q3 24
22.7%
0.7%
Q2 24
25.0%
11.3%
Q1 24
17.6%
-3.0%
EPS (diluted)
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$0.20
Q3 25
$1.35
$0.15
Q2 25
$1.42
$0.09
Q1 25
$1.25
$0.05
Q4 24
$1.22
$0.03
Q3 24
$1.33
$0.00
Q2 24
$1.49
$0.04
Q1 24
$0.98
$-0.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$301.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.4B
$2.6B
Total Assets
$77.4B
$3.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.73×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$301.2M
Q3 25
$133.9M
Q2 25
$296.6M
Q1 25
$23.7M
Q4 24
$26.9M
Q3 24
$22.3M
Q2 24
$24.6M
Q1 24
$80.2M
Total Debt
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
Q3 25
$5.4B
Q2 25
$5.8B
Q1 25
$5.7B
Q4 24
$6.7B
Q3 24
$6.8B
Q2 24
$7.1B
Q1 24
$7.1B
Stockholders' Equity
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$2.6B
Q3 25
$7.4B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$6.9B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$7.1B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$6.5B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$7.4B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$6.2B
$2.0B
Q1 24
$6.0B
$2.0B
Total Assets
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$3.6B
Q3 25
$77.4B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$78.0B
$3.3B
Q1 25
$77.6B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$79.3B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$79.7B
$3.0B
Q2 24
$79.6B
$2.9B
Q1 24
$79.4B
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
Q3 25
0.73×
Q2 25
0.84×
Q1 25
0.81×
Q4 24
1.02×
Q3 24
0.92×
Q2 24
1.15×
Q1 24
1.18×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-270.0M
$217.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$134.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
30.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
18.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.53×
1.61×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$310.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$217.1M
Q3 25
$-270.0M
$148.0M
Q2 25
$476.0M
$161.8M
Q1 25
$273.0M
$35.7M
Q4 24
$601.0M
$67.5M
Q3 24
$1.0B
$55.0M
Q2 24
$111.0M
$78.7M
Q1 24
$-205.0M
$17.1M
Free Cash Flow
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
$134.7M
Q3 25
$90.1M
Q2 25
$103.8M
Q1 25
$-18.4M
Q4 24
$6.7M
Q3 24
$-690.0K
Q2 24
$28.3M
Q1 24
$-30.5M
FCF Margin
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
30.1%
Q3 25
22.0%
Q2 25
34.1%
Q1 25
-7.0%
Q4 24
2.7%
Q3 24
-0.3%
Q2 24
11.5%
Q1 24
-16.1%
Capex Intensity
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
18.4%
Q3 25
14.1%
Q2 25
19.1%
Q1 25
20.7%
Q4 24
24.3%
Q3 24
22.7%
Q2 24
20.5%
Q1 24
25.1%
Cash Conversion
CMA
CMA
HL
HL
Q4 25
1.61×
Q3 25
-1.53×
1.47×
Q2 25
2.39×
2.80×
Q1 25
1.59×
1.24×
Q4 24
3.54×
5.66×
Q3 24
5.70×
31.24×
Q2 24
0.54×
2.82×
Q1 24
-1.49×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CMA
CMA

Segment breakdown not available.

HL
HL

Silver Contracts$258.5M58%
Gold$129.2M29%
Zinc$30.3M7%
Lead$23.3M5%
Environmental Remediation Services$9.2M2%

Related Comparisons