vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $804.2M, roughly 1.0× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 21.0%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.1% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 25.9%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
CMA vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $804.2M |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $193.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 26.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | 43.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $3.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $804.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $507.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $193.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $100.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.92 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $2.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $239.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $256.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $231.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $141.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
