vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $692.4M, roughly 1.2× OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 5.2%, a 15.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
CMA vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
