vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $651.6M, roughly 1.3× PROG Holdings, Inc.). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 5.5%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROG Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (457.1% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 4.9%).

Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.

PROG Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial technology firm providing flexible lease-to-own and point-of-sale financing solutions to consumers. Operating primarily in the U.S. market, its core segments include retail partner financing, consumer lending, and payment services that help customers access electronics and household goods without traditional credit requirements.

CMA vs PRG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CMA
CMA
1.3× larger
CMA
$838.0M
$651.6M
PRG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRG
PRG
+453.8% gap
PRG
457.1%
3.3%
CMA
Higher net margin
CMA
CMA
15.5% more per $
CMA
21.0%
5.5%
PRG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CMA
CMA
Annualised
CMA
108.9%
4.9%
PRG

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Revenue
$838.0M
$651.6M
Net Profit
$176.0M
$36.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
10.0%
Net Margin
21.0%
5.5%
Revenue YoY
3.3%
457.1%
Net Profit YoY
-4.3%
3.8%
EPS (diluted)
$1.35
$3.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$651.6M
Q4 25
$525.4M
Q3 25
$838.0M
$595.1M
Q2 25
$849.0M
$604.7M
Q1 25
$829.0M
$684.1M
Q4 24
$825.0M
$558.9M
Q3 24
$811.0M
$606.1M
Q2 24
$824.0M
$592.2M
Net Profit
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$36.1M
Q4 25
$40.5M
Q3 25
$176.0M
$33.1M
Q2 25
$199.0M
$38.5M
Q1 25
$172.0M
$34.7M
Q4 24
$170.0M
$57.5M
Q3 24
$184.0M
$84.0M
Q2 24
$206.0M
$33.8M
Operating Margin
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
10.0%
Q4 25
6.9%
Q3 25
9.0%
Q2 25
10.0%
Q1 25
8.2%
Q4 24
8.9%
Q3 24
8.1%
Q2 24
9.4%
Net Margin
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
5.5%
Q4 25
7.7%
Q3 25
21.0%
5.6%
Q2 25
23.4%
6.4%
Q1 25
20.7%
5.1%
Q4 24
20.6%
10.3%
Q3 24
22.7%
13.9%
Q2 24
25.0%
5.7%
EPS (diluted)
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$3.68
Q4 25
$0.99
Q3 25
$1.35
$0.82
Q2 25
$1.42
$0.95
Q1 25
$1.25
$0.83
Q4 24
$1.22
$1.33
Q3 24
$1.33
$1.94
Q2 24
$1.49
$0.77

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$69.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.4B
$774.4M
Total Assets
$77.4B
$2.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.73×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$69.4M
Q4 25
$308.8M
Q3 25
$292.6M
Q2 25
$222.0M
Q1 25
$213.3M
Q4 24
$90.9M
Q3 24
$221.7M
Q2 24
$250.1M
Total Debt
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$594.9M
Q3 25
$5.4B
Q2 25
$5.8B
Q1 25
$5.7B
Q4 24
$6.7B
$643.6M
Q3 24
$6.8B
Q2 24
$7.1B
Stockholders' Equity
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$774.4M
Q4 25
$746.4M
Q3 25
$7.4B
$703.6M
Q2 25
$6.9B
$668.7M
Q1 25
$7.1B
$654.4M
Q4 24
$6.5B
$650.3M
Q3 24
$7.4B
$630.8M
Q2 24
$6.2B
$581.9M
Total Assets
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$1.6B
Q3 25
$77.4B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$78.0B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$77.6B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$79.3B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$79.7B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$79.6B
$1.5B
Debt / Equity
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.80×
Q3 25
0.73×
Q2 25
0.84×
Q1 25
0.81×
Q4 24
1.02×
0.99×
Q3 24
0.92×
Q2 24
1.15×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-270.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-54.9M
Q3 25
$-270.0M
$110.0M
Q2 25
$476.0M
$69.9M
Q1 25
$273.0M
$209.9M
Q4 24
$601.0M
$-84.5M
Q3 24
$1.0B
$31.9M
Q2 24
$111.0M
$55.4M
Free Cash Flow
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-57.5M
Q3 25
$106.5M
Q2 25
$68.0M
Q1 25
$208.0M
Q4 24
$-86.8M
Q3 24
$29.8M
Q2 24
$53.5M
FCF Margin
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
-10.9%
Q3 25
17.9%
Q2 25
11.2%
Q1 25
30.4%
Q4 24
-15.5%
Q3 24
4.9%
Q2 24
9.0%
Capex Intensity
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.5%
Q3 25
0.6%
Q2 25
0.3%
Q1 25
0.3%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
0.3%
Q2 24
0.3%
Cash Conversion
CMA
CMA
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1.36×
Q3 25
-1.53×
3.32×
Q2 25
2.39×
1.82×
Q1 25
1.59×
6.05×
Q4 24
3.54×
-1.47×
Q3 24
5.70×
0.38×
Q2 24
0.54×
1.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons