vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RH is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($883.8M vs $838.0M, roughly 1.1× COMERICA INC). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 4.1%, a 16.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RH posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 9.4%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
CMA vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $784.0M | $738.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $-289.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $-297.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.4B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.0M | $-114.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-251.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | -10.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMA
Segment breakdown not available.
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
