vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $588.0M, roughly 1.4× Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 15.0%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Simpson Manufacturing Company is a leading building materials manufacturer in the United States that produces structural connectors, fasteners, anchors, and products for new construction and retrofitting.
CMA vs SSD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $588.0M |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $88.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 19.5% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 15.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | 13.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $2.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $588.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $539.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $623.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $631.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $538.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $587.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $597.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $107.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $103.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $97.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $2.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $1.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $1.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $341.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $384.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $297.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $150.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $339.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $354.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $371.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $382.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $388.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $393.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $399.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $155.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $170.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $125.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $115.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $103.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $111.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $87.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | 1.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
