vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and WEIBO Corp (WB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEIBO Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $838.0M, roughly 1.5× COMERICA INC). WEIBO Corp runs the higher net margin — 35.7% vs 21.0%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 22.6%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Weibo Corporation is a Chinese social network company known for the microblogging website Sina Weibo. It is based in Beijing, China.
CMA vs WB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $458.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.1% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 35.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $841.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $396.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $833.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $784.0M | $395.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $192.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $458.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $234.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $108.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $297.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $164.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $33.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | 17.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.4B | — |
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 23 | $85.8B | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.1B | — |
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 34.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMA
Segment breakdown not available.
WB
| Income from operations | $373.2M | 29% |
| Shares used in computing diluted net income per share attributable to Weibos shareholders | $268.1M | 21% |
| Shares used in computing basic net income per share attributable to Weibos shareholders | $238.6M | 19% |
| Value-added services | $186.1M | 14% |
| Less: Income tax expenses | $113.2M | 9% |
| Investment related income, net | $45.0M | 4% |
| Product development | $16.7M | 1% |
| General and administrative | $10.6M | 1% |
| Sales and marketing | $7.1M | 1% |
| Accretion to redeemable non-controlling interests | $3.0M | 0% |
