vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cambium Networks Corp (CMBM) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $40.3M, roughly 1.9× Cambium Networks Corp). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -17.9%, a 33.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs -23.2%). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.8M vs $-10.8M). Over the past eight quarters, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (21.4% CAGR vs -27.2%).
Cambium Networks Corporation is an American manufacturer of wireless telecommunications equipment, including Enterprise WiFi, Network switch, Internet of Things, and fixed wireless broadband and Wi-Fi for enterprises products for Internet access. Publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange, it spun out of Motorola in October 2011.
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
CMBM vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.3M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-7.2M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -28.4% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | -17.9% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.2% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 71.0% | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.3M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.7M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.2M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.1M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.4M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -33.1% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.9% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.2% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.22 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.66 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.2M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $173.7M | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.2M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.7M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.3M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.1M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $219.8M | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.42× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.4M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.8M | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.8% | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-21.4M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.4M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.9M | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0K | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.8% | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.0% | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBM
| Enterprise | $16.6M | 41% |
| Point To Multi Point | $16.4M | 41% |
| Other | $5.8M | 14% |
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
