vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) and FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CMB.TECH NV is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.8M vs $313.0M, roughly 1.9× FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC). FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs 32.3%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs -34.6%).
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
CMBT vs FIBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.8M | $313.0M |
| Net Profit | $191.2M | $108.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 46.4% | 44.5% |
| Net Margin | 32.3% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.6% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.3% | 108.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $250.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.8M | $261.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $251.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $244.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $242.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.2M | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $146.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $26.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.20× | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $252.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $383.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $370.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $29.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.4M | $305.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $305.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $355.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 6.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
