vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $592.8M, roughly 1.9× CMB.TECH NV). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 3.5%, a 28.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -34.6%).
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
CMBT vs FND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.8M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $191.2M | $39.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | 46.4% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 32.3% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.6% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.3% | -17.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.2M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.9M | $249.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $5.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $249.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.4M | $381.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 9.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $381.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $194.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.71× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.