vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) and POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CMB.TECH NV is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.8M vs $314.2M, roughly 1.9× POTLATCHDELTIC CORP). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 8.2%, a 24.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs -34.6%).
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
CMBT vs PCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.8M | $314.2M |
| Net Profit | $191.2M | $25.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 46.4% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 32.3% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.6% | 23.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.3% | 682.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $314.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $268.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.8M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $320.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $228.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $905.9M | $254.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.2M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-305.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $521.2M | $-140.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 8.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | 63.4% | 0.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | 57.5% | -0.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.58 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.9M | $88.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $95.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.9M | $151.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $180.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $429.4M | $230.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $930.7M | $1.0B |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.4B | $3.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.39× | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.4M | $65.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 2.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $132.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $435.8M | $41.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $65.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | 7.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | 40.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 8.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.84× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBT
Segment breakdown not available.
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
