vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Elme Communities (ELME). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Elme Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.3× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -198.9%, a 205.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
CMCL vs ELME — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $62.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-123.5M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -183.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -198.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -4058.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $60.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $59.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $38.7M | $58.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-123.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.6M | $-3.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | 61.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 63.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 63.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.3% | 65.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | -183.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | 6.0% | 10.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | -198.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | -6.7% | -5.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.19 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $7.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $908.9M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.7M | $6.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | $224.2M | $1.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 23 | $328.3M | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $15.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $86.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $22.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 11.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 27.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
