vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and WM TECHNOLOGY, INC. (MAPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $43.1M, roughly 1.1× WM TECHNOLOGY, INC.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -8.3%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -9.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
WM Entertainment is a South Korean entertainment company established in 2008 by former singer Lee Won-min. The company is responsible for managing artist Oh My Girl. On April 7, 2021, the company was acquired by RBW.
CMCL vs MAPS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $43.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-3.6M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 94.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -8.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -9.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -251.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $44.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $716.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 94.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 95.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 94.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 95.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 95.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 95.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 95.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 94.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $62.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $57.2M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $190.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $62.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $192.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $188.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $183.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $173.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $168.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $165.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-280.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $13.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-280.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 17.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
MAPS
| Services | $39.5M | 92% |
| Other | $3.6M | 8% |