vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($49.7M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.1× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -3.8%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -1.0%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Gen Korean BBQ is an American chain of all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue restaurants mainly concentrated around the Western U.S. It opened in 2011, and has since grown to 43 locations as of 2024.
CMCL vs GENK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $49.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -821.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $53.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $50.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-566.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-261.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-301.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-206.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $25.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $277.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $496.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -24.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $2.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $13.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $26.5M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $259.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $28.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $46.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $40.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $259.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $246.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $232.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $240.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $218.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $214.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-426.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-24.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-426.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $165.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-586.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 57.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 20.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
