vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANMI FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.2M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.5× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 7.0%, a 22.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
CMCL vs HAFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $71.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $21.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $796.4M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $779.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $762.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $751.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $732.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $736.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $707.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $703.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $7.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $206.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $203.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 286.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 286.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 206.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
