vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.1M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.1× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Logistic Properties of the Americas runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs 7.0%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is a specialized industrial real estate firm that acquires, develops and manages logistics properties across North, Central and South America. Its portfolio includes distribution centers, warehouses and last-mile delivery facilities, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and third-party logistics clients.
CMCL vs LPA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 81.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 32.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $38.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 6.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -6.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $296.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $324.6M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $700.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $296.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $324.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $224.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $700.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $328.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $21.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 42.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $966.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $218.9K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
