vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.2× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -19.9%, a 26.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
CMCL vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
