vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.8× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -72.1%, a 79.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
CMCL vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
