vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.1× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -106.3%, a 113.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
CMCL vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $38.7M | $50.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.6M | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 6.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | -6.7% | 18.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.19 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $873.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $484.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $224.2M | $483.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | $328.3M | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $18.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
