vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.0× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -1.9%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 13.8%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
CMCL vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
