vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC (SYPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $30.3M, roughly 1.5× SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -12.9%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -9.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Sypris Solutions Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered provider of highly engineered components and specialized technical services, primarily serving aerospace, defense, automotive and commercial industrial markets. It delivers custom manufacturing, performance testing, and value-added engineering support for mission-critical systems and parts for global enterprise clients.
CMCL vs SYPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $30.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-3.9M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 4.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -10.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -9.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -2992.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $517.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-899.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $135.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $390.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $16.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $17.8M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $107.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $112.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $105.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $121.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $124.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $129.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-178.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-390.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $941.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | -12.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 385.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
SYPR
| Sypris Electronics | $17.7M | 59% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.5M | 41% |
