vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Telesat Corp (TSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Telesat Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.8M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.6× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -119.8%, a 126.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -64.0%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Telesat, formerly Telesat Canada, is a Canadian satellite communications company founded on May 2, 1969. The company is headquartered in Ottawa.
CMCL vs TSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $73.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-88.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 95.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 5.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -119.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $363.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $41.2M | $552.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-88.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $547.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $4.9M | $-172.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | 95.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 34.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 22.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -119.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 150.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 12.0% | -31.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $352.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $352.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $552.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $10.8M | $1.7B |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $224.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $226.6M | $1.8B |
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $328.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $320.3M | $6.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $14.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 2.94× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
