vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIMPRESS plc (CMPR) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIMPRESS plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $751.2M, roughly 1.4× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 4.7%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 11.0%). CIMPRESS plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($139.5M vs $63.9M).
Cimpress plc is an American Irish-domiciled multinational technology company that invests in and operates a wide variety of businesses that use mass customization to configure and produce small quantities of individually customized goods. Those products are sold to small businesses, graphic designers and consumers through a number of customer-facing brands that Cimpress operates.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
CMPR vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $751.2M |
| Net Profit | $49.3M | $171.7M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 22.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 20.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.2% | -86.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $3.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $863.3M | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $507.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $457.9M |
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.5M |
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.7% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 55.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.30 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-530.7M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $200.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $-530.7M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-571.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $164.7M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $139.5M | $63.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.4% | 8.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.34× | 0.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $666.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $164.7M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.1M | $239.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $256.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | $139.5M | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $232.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.34× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.28× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMPR
| Vista | $532.8M | 51% |
| Print Brothers | $219.9M | 21% |
| National Pen | $150.9M | 14% |
| The Print Group | $115.2M | 11% |
| All Other Businesses | $67.2M | 6% |
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
