vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIMPRESS plc (CMPR) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.2× CIMPRESS plc). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 4.7%, a 26.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 11.0%).
Cimpress plc is an American Irish-domiciled multinational technology company that invests in and operates a wide variety of businesses that use mass customization to configure and produce small quantities of individually customized goods. Those products are sold to small businesses, graphic designers and consumers through a number of customer-facing brands that Cimpress operates.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
CMPR vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $49.3M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $863.3M | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.7% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.30 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.0M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-530.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $200.5M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-530.7M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-571.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $164.7M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $139.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.34× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $164.7M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.1M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $139.5M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.34× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.28× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMPR
| Vista | $532.8M | 51% |
| Print Brothers | $219.9M | 21% |
| National Pen | $150.9M | 14% |
| The Print Group | $115.2M | 11% |
| All Other Businesses | $67.2M | 6% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
