vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMS Energy (CMS) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.2× CMS Energy). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 13.5%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 13.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -0.2%).
CMS Energy Corporation is an American energy company based in Jackson, Michigan, that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan. Its principal business is Consumers Energy, a public utility that provides electricity and natural gas to more than 6 million of Michigan's 10 million residents. Its non-utility businesses are focused primarily on domestic independent power production. Consumers Energy has operated since 1886.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CMS vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $289.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.5% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $289.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.01 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.96 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $509.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $39.9B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $509.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $844.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $412.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $699.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $39.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.8B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.9B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $478.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $956.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-635.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-470.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-502.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $343.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.57× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.33× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMS
| Electric Utility | $1.3B | 59% |
| Gas Utility | $803.0M | 38% |
| North Star Clean Energy | $77.0M | 4% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
