vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) and OLB GROUP, INC. (OLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLB GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8M vs $1.7M, roughly 1.0× ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.). ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — -6.3% vs -83.7%, a 77.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLB GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-35.2% vs -47.0%). Over the past eight quarters, OLB GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-28.7% CAGR vs -56.8%).
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc., trading under the symbol CNET, is a China-based technology enterprise focused on delivering integrated digital marketing solutions, big data analysis services, and intelligent operation tools for enterprise clients across sectors including e-commerce, consumer goods, and internet services. Its offerings help clients optimize user acquisition efficiency, boost operational performance, and advance digital transformation, primarily serving the Chinese domestic market and select Asia-Pacific clients.
OLB Group, Inc. is a global financial technology provider offering omnichannel payment processing solutions, e-commerce enablement tools, and digital banking services for small and medium-sized enterprises across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets. Its core segments include merchant services, crypto payment integration, and cloud-based business management platforms.
CNET vs OLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $-108.0K | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -83.7% |
| Net Margin | -6.3% | -83.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -47.0% | -35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.4% | 67.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-108.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-531.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-781.0K | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-216.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-850.0K | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.9% | -49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -74.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.1% | -166.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -61.5% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -74.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | -82.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | -50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -93.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.1% | -46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.7% | -167.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.1% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -75.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.1% | -67.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $9.7M | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.0K | $29.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $812.0K | $27.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $41.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $510.0K | $53.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $467.0K | $3.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | $18.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-482.0K | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-482.0K | $-115.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-984.0K | $-155.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-830.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.0K | $-376.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-677.0K | $-785.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-353.0K | $-424.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNET
| Online Advertising Placement | $1.6M | 95% |
| Other | $83.0K | 5% |
OLB
| Transaction And Processing Fees | $1.7M | 94% |
| Other | $99.2K | 6% |
