vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and GENMAB A/S (GMAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Core Natural Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $925.0M, roughly 1.1× GENMAB A/S). GENMAB A/S runs the higher net margin — 36.3% vs -7.6%, a 43.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Core Natural Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81.8% vs 18.7%). GENMAB A/S produced more free cash flow last quarter ($327.0M vs $26.0M).
Arch Resources, previously known as Arch Coal, was an American coal mining and processing company. The company mined, processed, and marketed bituminous and sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content in the United States. Arch Resources was the second-largest supplier of coal in the United States, behind Peabody Energy. As of 2011 the company supplied 15% of the domestic market. Demand came mainly from generators of electricity.
Genmab A/S is a Danish biotechnology company, founded in February 1999 by Florian Schönharting, at the time managing director of BankInvest Biomedical venture fund. The company is based in Copenhagen, Denmark – internationally, it operates through the subsidiaries Genmab B.V. in Utrecht, The Netherlands, Genmab U.S., Inc. in Princeton, New Jersey, US, Genmab K.K. in Tokyo, Japan, Genmab Germany GmbH in München, Germany and Genmab (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. in Suzhou, China. Genmab is listed on the Co...
CNR vs GMAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $925.0M |
| Net Profit | $-79.0M | $336.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 93.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 38.9% |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | 36.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 81.8% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.3% | 65.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.51 | $5.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $925.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.7M | $779.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $546.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-79.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.6M | $336.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $203.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 93.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 96.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $5.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.38 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $3.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.39 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $432.2M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $5.3B |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $622.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $354.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | $349.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $26.0M | $327.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | 35.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.2M | $349.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-109.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $438.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-174.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.9M | $430.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 2.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNR
| Other | $397.4M | 38% |
| Power Generation | $376.5M | 36% |
| PRB | $183.0M | 18% |
| Metallurgical | $42.0M | 4% |
| Industrial | $34.1M | 3% |
| Terminal Revenue | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Revenue | $3.0M | 0% |
GMAB
| Darzalex | $638.0M | 69% |
| Kesimpta | $108.0M | 12% |
| Net Product Sales | $101.0M | 11% |
| Other | $28.0M | 3% |
| Tepezza | $20.0M | 2% |
| Reimbursement Revenue | $13.0M | 1% |
| Bio N Tech | $11.0M | 1% |
| Abb Vie | $5.0M | 1% |
| Milestone Revenue | $1.0M | 0% |
