vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.0× Core Natural Resources, Inc.). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs -7.6%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Core Natural Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81.8% vs 43.9%). Teradyne produced more free cash flow last quarter ($218.8M vs $26.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Core Natural Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.1% CAGR vs 34.4%).
Arch Resources, previously known as Arch Coal, was an American coal mining and processing company. The company mined, processed, and marketed bituminous and sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content in the United States. Arch Resources was the second-largest supplier of coal in the United States, behind Peabody Energy. As of 2011 the company supplied 15% of the domestic market. Demand came mainly from generators of electricity.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
CNR vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-79.0M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 81.8% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.3% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.51 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.6M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.4M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.7M | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $546.7M | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-79.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.6M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.3M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.6M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.9M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.51 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.38 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.04 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.39 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $432.2M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.7M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.2M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.5M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.2M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.7M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.6M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | $354.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $26.0M | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.2M | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.3M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.9M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.2M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-109.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.3M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.5M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-174.5M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.9M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.78× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNR
| Other | $397.4M | 38% |
| Power Generation | $376.5M | 36% |
| PRB | $183.0M | 18% |
| Metallurgical | $42.0M | 4% |
| Industrial | $34.1M | 3% |
| Terminal Revenue | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Revenue | $3.0M | 0% |
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
