vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COHEN & STEERS, INC. (CNS) and JFrog Ltd (FROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JFrog Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($145.3M vs $143.8M, roughly 1.0× COHEN & STEERS, INC.). COHEN & STEERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 24.3% vs -10.5%, a 34.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JFrog Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs 2.9%). JFrog Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($49.9M vs $-126.4M). Over the past eight quarters, JFrog Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs 8.3%).
Cohen & Steers is an American investment management company. It focuses on investments in real estate securities via real estate investment trusts (REIT) and alternative income via preferred securities.
JFrog Ltd is a global DevOps technology provider that delivers end-to-end software release, artifact management, and security solutions. It serves clients across tech, finance, retail, and manufacturing sectors, helping teams streamline development and delivery workflows for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructure.
CNS vs FROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.8M | $145.3M |
| Net Profit | $34.9M | $-15.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | -14.7% |
| Net Margin | 24.3% | -10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.9% | 25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.9% | 34.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.8M | $145.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.7M | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.1M | $127.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.5M | $122.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.8M | $116.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.2M | $109.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.7M | $103.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.7M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.8M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.8M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.7M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.0M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 79.5% |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | -14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.8% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.3% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.8% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.4% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.6% | -15.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.8% | -20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | -21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.1% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.7% | -8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.81 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.63 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.68 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $145.5M | $704.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $562.0M | $887.4M |
| Total Assets | $876.7M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $704.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $651.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.4M | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.2M | $563.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $183.0M | $522.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.5M | $467.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.0M | $591.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.5M | $579.6M |
| Q4 25 | $562.0M | $887.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $550.3M | $859.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $528.5M | $826.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.7M | $800.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.7M | $773.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.0M | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $721.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $378.9M | $707.8M |
| Q4 25 | $876.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $801.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $751.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $812.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $727.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $784.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $680.7M | $997.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-120.4M | $50.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-126.4M | $49.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -87.9% | 34.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.45× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-253.6M | $142.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-120.4M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.1M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-67.6M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-108.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.4M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-126.4M | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.8M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.0M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.0M | $48.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $537.0K | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | -87.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -51.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.8% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.8% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
