vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $7.3M, roughly 1.8× Coda Octopus Group, Inc.). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs -13.2%, a 27.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.8% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs 16.1%).
CODA plc was a mid-sized international financial software company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1979, it was purchased in 2008 by Unit4, a supplier of enterprise software, based in the Netherlands. CODA creates, markets and implements a range of business software systems designed for finance directors and finance departments. These include:financial management systems like accounting software and procurement software: financial analysis applications like reporting, consolidation and...
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
CODA vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.3M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.0M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 14.1% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.8% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 214.3% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $908.8K | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $913.0K | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.2K | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $629.9K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.8% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.9% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.2% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.1M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $64.5M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $58.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.9M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.1M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $64.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.9M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.0M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.9M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.5K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-955.8K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-298.0K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-433.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CODA
| Segment Reporting | $3.1M | 42% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 24% |
| Precision Acoustics Limited | $1.3M | 18% |
| Other | $1.1M | 15% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
