vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 7.2%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 9.0%). Teradyne produced more free cash flow last quarter ($218.8M vs $106.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 9.4%).
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is the largest independent Coca-Cola bottler in the United States.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
COKE vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $137.3M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.3% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $137.3M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.3M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.4M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.9M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.8M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.7M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.6% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.6% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.7% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.5% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.9% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.4% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $281.9M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-739.7M | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $281.9M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $401.3M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-739.7M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.37× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $209.0M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $106.7M | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $619.6M | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $209.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.7M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.1M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.2M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.5M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.8M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.9M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.3M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $106.7M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.5M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.3M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.8M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.8M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $117.2M | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.22× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.11× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.34× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COKE
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.9B | 99% |
| Transferred Over Time | $15.1M | 1% |
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
