vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $624.4M, roughly 1.5× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 1.0%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EnerSys posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.4% vs -33.2%). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($348.6M vs $171.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
ENS vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $624.4M |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | -33.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | -96.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $317.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | $171.1M |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $-52.5M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | -30.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $-1.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $436.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | $462.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $360.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | $348.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | 55.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 60.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | $417.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-171.2M |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-182.0M |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -106.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | -0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
