vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST (COLD) and PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. (PTON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($656.5M vs $643.1M, roughly 1.0× AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST). PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.9% vs -13.7%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -2.6%). PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.0M vs $-12.2M).
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is an American temperature controlled warehousing and transportation company based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is in the business of modern commercialized temperature controlled warehousing for the storage of perishable goods via a cold chain, one of the forms of food preservation. Americold is the 2nd largest temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution services provider in the world.
Peloton Interactive, Inc. is an American exercise equipment and media company based in New York City. The company's products include stationary bicycles, treadmills, and indoor rowers equipped with Internet-connected touch screens that stream live and on-demand fitness classes through a subscription service. The equipment includes built-in sensors that track metrics such as power output, providing users with real-time feedback on their performance and leaderboard rankings to compete with othe...
COLD vs PTON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $643.1M | $656.5M |
| Net Profit | $-88.3M | $-38.8M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.7% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | -2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -143.9% | 57.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $643.1M | $656.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $649.0M | $550.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $651.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-88.3M | $-38.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.7% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.9M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $-326.7M |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $-326.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $-347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.2M | $71.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.2M | $71.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.9% | 10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-217.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.2M | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.4M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLD
| Warehouse Services | $269.0M | 42% |
| Warehouse Rent And Storage | $199.9M | 31% |
| Other Facilities Costs | $60.0M | 9% |
| Transportation Segment | $48.3M | 8% |
| Power | $34.7M | 5% |
| Transportation | $22.0M | 3% |
| Third Party Managed Segment | $9.5M | 1% |
| Third Party Managed | $2.4M | 0% |
PTON
| Subscription And Circulation | $412.6M | 63% |
| Connected Fitness Products Segment | $243.9M | 37% |
| Product Warranty | $4.0M | 1% |
