vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST (COLD) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($934.8M vs $643.1M, roughly 1.5× AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST). Sensata Technologies Holding plc runs the higher net margin — 9.3% vs -13.7%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sensata Technologies Holding plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -0.7%). Sensata Technologies Holding plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($104.6M vs $-12.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -5.0%).
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is an American temperature controlled warehousing and transportation company based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is in the business of modern commercialized temperature controlled warehousing for the storage of perishable goods via a cold chain, one of the forms of food preservation. Americold is the 2nd largest temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution services provider in the world.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is a global industrial technology company that designs, manufactures and sells a broad portfolio of sensing, electrical protection and control solutions. Its products serve automotive, industrial, aerospace, HVAC, telecommunications and heavy vehicle end markets, catering to manufacturing and enterprise clients across the world.
COLD vs ST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $643.1M | $934.8M |
| Net Profit | $-88.3M | $87.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.7% | 9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -143.9% | 24.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $934.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $643.1M | $917.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $649.0M | $932.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.1M | $943.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $911.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.4M | $907.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.4M | $982.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.6M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-88.3M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $-162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.4M | $69.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.1M | $71.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | -17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $-1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.9M | $635.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $6.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $635.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.4M | $661.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $588.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $593.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $506.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.2M | $122.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.2M | $104.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.9% | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-217.2M | $508.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $122.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.2M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | $159.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | $170.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | $130.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.7M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.4M | $136.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.4M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.3M | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | $138.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.5M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | $98.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.18× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLD
| Warehouse Services | $269.0M | 42% |
| Warehouse Rent And Storage | $199.9M | 31% |
| Other Facilities Costs | $60.0M | 9% |
| Transportation Segment | $48.3M | 8% |
| Power | $34.7M | 5% |
| Transportation | $22.0M | 3% |
| Third Party Managed Segment | $9.5M | 1% |
| Third Party Managed | $2.4M | 0% |
ST
Segment breakdown not available.
