vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ConocoPhillips (COP) and GLOBAL PARTNERS LP (GLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ConocoPhillips is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.4B vs $2.2B, roughly 5.2× GLOBAL PARTNERS LP). ConocoPhillips runs the higher net margin — 12.7% vs 1.1%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -10.7%). Over the past eight quarters, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP's revenue compounded faster (0.2% CAGR vs -3.8%).
ConocoPhillips Company is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and production. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
Global Partners LP is an American energy supply company ranked 361 in the 2018 Fortune 500. The company is organized as a master limited partnership, and its operations focus on the importing of petroleum products and marketing them in North America. It wholesales products like crude oil, diesel oil, gasoline, heating oil and kerosene.
COP vs GLP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.4B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.4B | $25.1M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | 12.7% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.7% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.5% | 5.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $-5.6M |
| Q4 25 | 54.4% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | 9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.9% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.92 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.98 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.15 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $64.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $121.9B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $64.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $121.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.3B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.3B | $101.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $62.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | 4.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $193.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $216.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $-51.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $67.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $122.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0B | $-182.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-678.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $201.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $98.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-199.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.99× | 4.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | 8.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.15× | -2.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 2.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | 2.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COP
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.1B | 18% |
| Physical Gas Contracts | $2.0B | 18% |
| Europe Middle East And North Africa Segment | $1.6B | 14% |
| Natural Gas Product Line | $1.5B | 13% |
| Canada Operating Segment | $1.3B | 12% |
| Alaska Segment | $1.3B | 11% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $826.0M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific Operating Segment | $360.0M | 3% |
| Crude Oil Product Line | $236.0M | 2% |
| Related Party | $12.0M | 0% |
| Corporate Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
GLP
| Gasoline | $1.0B | 46% |
| Refined Petroleum Products Renewable Fuels Crude Oil And Propane | $884.7M | 40% |
| Commercial Segment | $187.6M | 8% |
| Station Operations | $110.5M | 5% |
