vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Diamondback Energy (FANG) and GLOBAL PARTNERS LP (GLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Diamondback Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.5× GLOBAL PARTNERS LP). GLOBAL PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -43.2%, a 44.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs 0.2%).

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.

Global Partners LP is an American energy supply company ranked 361 in the 2018 Fortune 500. The company is organized as a master limited partnership, and its operations focus on the importing of petroleum products and marketing them in North America. It wholesales products like crude oil, diesel oil, gasoline, heating oil and kerosene.

FANG vs GLP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FANG
FANG
1.5× larger
FANG
$3.4B
$2.2B
GLP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GLP
GLP
+16.0% gap
GLP
7.0%
-9.0%
FANG
Higher net margin
GLP
GLP
44.3% more per $
GLP
1.1%
-43.2%
FANG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FANG
FANG
Annualised
FANG
23.1%
0.2%
GLP

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025

Metric
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Revenue
$3.4B
$2.2B
Net Profit
$-1.5B
$25.1M
Gross Margin
11.9%
Operating Margin
-82.4%
2.6%
Net Margin
-43.2%
1.1%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
7.0%
Net Profit YoY
-235.8%
5.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$3.4B
$2.2B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$2.1B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.3B
Q1 24
$2.2B
$2.2B
Net Profit
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$-1.5B
$25.1M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$29.0M
Q2 25
$699.0M
$25.2M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$18.7M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$23.9M
Q3 24
$659.0M
$45.9M
Q2 24
$837.0M
$46.1M
Q1 24
$768.0M
$-5.6M
Gross Margin
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
11.9%
Q3 25
12.1%
Q2 25
13.1%
Q1 25
11.7%
Q4 24
13.0%
Q3 24
13.4%
Q2 24
12.6%
Q1 24
9.8%
Operating Margin
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
-82.4%
2.6%
Q3 25
31.5%
2.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
2.9%
Q1 25
41.3%
2.6%
Q4 24
38.0%
2.8%
Q3 24
26.8%
3.9%
Q2 24
46.6%
3.7%
Q1 24
50.2%
1.2%
Net Margin
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
-43.2%
1.1%
Q3 25
25.9%
1.3%
Q2 25
19.0%
1.2%
Q1 25
34.7%
0.9%
Q4 24
28.9%
1.2%
Q3 24
24.9%
2.1%
Q2 24
33.7%
2.0%
Q1 24
34.5%
-0.3%
EPS (diluted)
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$-4.99
Q3 25
$3.51
Q2 25
$2.38
Q1 25
$4.83
Q4 24
$3.40
Q3 24
$3.19
Q2 24
$4.66
Q1 24
$4.28

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$104.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$37.0B
Total Assets
$71.1B
$3.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.37×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$104.0M
Q3 25
$159.0M
Q2 25
$219.0M
Q1 25
$1.8B
Q4 24
$161.0M
Q3 24
$370.0M
Q2 24
$6.9B
Q1 24
$896.0M
Total Debt
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$13.7B
Q3 25
$15.8B
Q2 25
$15.1B
Q1 25
$13.0B
Q4 24
$12.1B
Q3 24
$11.9B
Q2 24
$12.0B
Q1 24
$6.6B
Stockholders' Equity
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$37.0B
Q3 25
$39.1B
Q2 25
$38.9B
Q1 25
$38.5B
Q4 24
$37.7B
Q3 24
$37.4B
Q2 24
$17.4B
Q1 24
$16.9B
Total Assets
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$71.1B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$76.2B
$3.7B
Q2 25
$71.9B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$70.1B
$3.8B
Q4 24
$67.3B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$65.7B
$3.7B
Q2 24
$35.6B
$3.8B
Q1 24
$29.7B
$3.5B
Debt / Equity
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
0.37×
Q3 25
0.41×
Q2 25
0.39×
Q1 25
0.34×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.69×
Q1 24
0.39×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.3B
$101.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$62.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$193.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$2.3B
$101.0M
Q3 25
$2.4B
$19.0M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$216.3M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$-51.6M
Q4 24
$2.3B
$67.2M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$122.7M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$24.3M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$-182.7M
Free Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$62.2M
Q3 25
$-678.0K
Q2 25
$201.3M
Q1 25
$-69.5M
Q4 24
$20.4M
Q3 24
$98.4M
Q2 24
$8.7M
Q1 24
$-199.3M
FCF Margin
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
2.8%
Q3 25
-0.0%
Q2 25
9.7%
Q1 25
-3.2%
Q4 24
1.0%
Q3 24
4.6%
Q2 24
0.4%
Q1 24
-9.0%
Capex Intensity
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
1.8%
Q3 25
0.9%
Q2 25
0.7%
Q1 25
0.8%
Q4 24
2.3%
Q3 24
1.1%
Q2 24
0.7%
Q1 24
0.8%
Cash Conversion
FANG
FANG
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
4.03×
Q3 25
2.34×
0.66×
Q2 25
2.40×
8.58×
Q1 25
1.68×
-2.76×
Q4 24
2.18×
2.82×
Q3 24
1.83×
2.67×
Q2 24
1.83×
0.53×
Q1 24
1.74×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FANG
FANG

Oil Explorationand Production$2.7B81%
Oil Purchased$308.0M9%
Natural Gas Liquids Production$293.0M9%
Natural Gas Production$4.0M0%

GLP
GLP

Gasoline$1.0B46%
Refined Petroleum Products Renewable Fuels Crude Oil And Propane$884.7M40%
Commercial Segment$187.6M8%
Station Operations$110.5M5%

Related Comparisons