vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ConocoPhillips (COP) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Oracle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.1B vs $11.4B, roughly 1.4× ConocoPhillips). Oracle Corporation runs the higher net margin — 38.2% vs 12.7%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Oracle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -10.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Oracle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (10.0% CAGR vs -3.8%).
ConocoPhillips Company is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and production. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
An oracle is a person or thing considered to provide insight, wise counsel or prophetic predictions, most notably including precognition of the future, inspired by deities. If done through occultic means, it is a form of divination.
COP vs ORCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.4B | $16.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.4B | $6.1B |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 29.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.7% | 38.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.7% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.5% | 94.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | $2.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $14.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $15.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7B | $14.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3B | $13.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.9% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | 18.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.18 | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.23 | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.92 | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.76 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.98 | $1.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.15 | $0.85 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0B | $19.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $64.5B | $30.0B |
| Total Assets | $121.9B | $205.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $19.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $10.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | $9.5B |
| Q4 25 | $22.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $64.5B | $30.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.9B | $24.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.6B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.2B | $16.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.8B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9B | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.3B | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | $121.9B | $205.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5B | $180.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6B | $168.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3B | $161.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.8B | $148.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7B | $144.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.0B | $141.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.3B | $137.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.3B | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-10.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -62.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 74.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | 0.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-13.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0B | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | -62.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.99× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | 1.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.15× | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.95× | 2.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COP
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.1B | 18% |
| Physical Gas Contracts | $2.0B | 18% |
| Europe Middle East And North Africa Segment | $1.6B | 14% |
| Natural Gas Product Line | $1.5B | 13% |
| Canada Operating Segment | $1.3B | 12% |
| Alaska Segment | $1.3B | 11% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $826.0M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific Operating Segment | $360.0M | 3% |
| Crude Oil Product Line | $236.0M | 2% |
| Related Party | $12.0M | 0% |
| Corporate Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
ORCL
| Software Support | $4.9B | 31% |
| Cloud Infrastructure | $4.1B | 25% |
| Cloud Applications | $3.9B | 24% |
| Services Business | $1.4B | 9% |
| Software License | $939.0M | 6% |
| Hardware Business | $776.0M | 5% |
