vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD (CP) and Packaging Corporation of America (PKG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.2× Packaging Corporation of America). CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD runs the higher net margin — 27.7% vs 7.2%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Packaging Corporation of America posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Packaging Corporation of America's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs 5.6%).

The Canadian National Railway Company is a Canadian Class I freight railway headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, which serves Canada and the Midwestern and Southern United States. It is one of Canada's two main freight rail companies, along with Canadian Pacific Kansas City.

Packaging Corporation of America is an American manufacturing company based in Lake Forest, Illinois. The company has about 15,500 employees, with operations primarily in the United States. The CEO is Mark W. Kowlzan.

CP vs PKG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CP
CP
1.2× larger
CP
$2.8B
$2.4B
PKG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PKG
PKG
+9.3% gap
PKG
10.6%
1.3%
CP
Higher net margin
CP
CP
20.4% more per $
CP
27.7%
7.2%
PKG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PKG
PKG
Annualised
PKG
6.8%
5.6%
CP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Revenue
$2.8B
$2.4B
Net Profit
$786.2M
$170.9M
Gross Margin
19.1%
Operating Margin
41.4%
10.6%
Net Margin
27.7%
7.2%
Revenue YoY
1.3%
10.6%
Net Profit YoY
-10.3%
-16.1%
EPS (diluted)
$1.91

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$2.4B
Q4 25
$2.8B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$2.3B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$2.8B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.6B
$2.1B
Net Profit
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$170.9M
Q4 25
$786.2M
$101.9M
Q3 25
$671.6M
$226.9M
Q2 25
$900.8M
$241.5M
Q1 25
$664.3M
$203.8M
Q4 24
$876.7M
$221.2M
Q3 24
$611.0M
$238.1M
Q2 24
$660.6M
$198.9M
Gross Margin
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
19.1%
Q4 25
18.9%
Q3 25
21.8%
Q2 25
22.2%
Q1 25
21.2%
Q4 24
21.9%
Q3 24
23.1%
Q2 24
21.1%
Operating Margin
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
10.6%
Q4 25
41.4%
7.1%
Q3 25
36.8%
14.0%
Q2 25
36.6%
15.4%
Q1 25
35.0%
13.1%
Q4 24
40.6%
14.1%
Q3 24
34.3%
15.0%
Q2 24
35.4%
13.3%
Net Margin
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
7.2%
Q4 25
27.7%
4.3%
Q3 25
25.3%
9.8%
Q2 25
33.6%
11.1%
Q1 25
24.2%
9.5%
Q4 24
31.2%
10.3%
Q3 24
23.9%
10.9%
Q2 24
25.3%
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$1.91
Q4 25
$1.14
Q3 25
$2.51
Q2 25
$2.67
Q1 25
$2.26
Q4 24
$2.45
Q3 24
$2.64
Q2 24
$2.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$134.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$14.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$33.5B
Total Assets
$62.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$134.3M
$529.0M
Q3 25
$300.0M
$634.0M
Q2 25
$583.3M
$787.9M
Q1 25
$507.4M
$751.7M
Q4 24
$539.5M
$685.0M
Q3 24
$338.0M
$676.6M
Q2 24
$406.6M
$613.6M
Total Debt
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$14.6B
$4.0B
Q3 25
$15.8B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$15.5B
Q1 25
$15.4B
Q4 24
$14.5B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$13.7B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$13.8B
Stockholders' Equity
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$33.5B
$4.6B
Q3 25
$33.4B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$33.7B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$35.2B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$35.0B
$4.4B
Q3 24
$32.2B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$32.0B
$4.1B
Total Assets
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$62.7B
$10.7B
Q3 25
$63.3B
$11.0B
Q2 25
$62.2B
$9.0B
Q1 25
$64.3B
$9.0B
Q4 24
$64.1B
$8.8B
Q3 24
$60.0B
$8.8B
Q2 24
$60.4B
$9.0B
Debt / Equity
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.43×
0.87×
Q3 25
0.47×
0.84×
Q2 25
0.46×
Q1 25
0.44×
Q4 24
0.41×
0.57×
Q3 24
0.42×
0.58×
Q2 24
0.43×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$537.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
20.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.42×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.1B
$446.6M
Q3 25
$930.0M
$472.2M
Q2 25
$989.1M
$299.6M
Q1 25
$843.9M
$339.1M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$325.4M
Q3 24
$928.6M
$327.1M
Q2 24
$932.9M
$278.3M
Free Cash Flow
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$537.3M
$127.6M
Q3 25
$302.2M
$280.1M
Q2 25
$446.8M
$129.9M
Q1 25
$324.9M
$191.0M
Q4 24
$702.3M
$124.1M
Q3 24
$382.5M
$180.4M
Q2 24
$343.1M
$33.3M
FCF Margin
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
18.9%
5.4%
Q3 25
11.4%
12.1%
Q2 25
16.7%
6.0%
Q1 25
11.8%
8.9%
Q4 24
25.0%
5.8%
Q3 24
15.0%
8.3%
Q2 24
13.1%
1.6%
Capex Intensity
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
20.2%
13.5%
Q3 25
23.7%
8.3%
Q2 25
20.2%
7.8%
Q1 25
18.9%
6.9%
Q4 24
19.3%
9.4%
Q3 24
21.4%
6.7%
Q2 24
22.6%
11.8%
Cash Conversion
CP
CP
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.42×
4.38×
Q3 25
1.38×
2.08×
Q2 25
1.10×
1.24×
Q1 25
1.27×
1.66×
Q4 24
1.42×
1.47×
Q3 24
1.52×
1.37×
Q2 24
1.41×
1.40×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons