vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP (CPF) and DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.0M vs $72.9M, roughly 1.1× CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs 28.4%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 6.0%).
Central Pacific Bank (CPB) is an American regional commercial bank located throughout the state of Hawaii.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
CPF vs DDI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.9M | $83.0M |
| Net Profit | $20.7M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.4% | 30.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.7% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $10.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $72.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.6M | $83.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $88.2M |
| Q1 26 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $33.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 41.0% |
| Q1 26 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | $10.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $13.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $372.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $76.5M | $37.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $593.9M | $815.5M |
| Total Assets | $7.5B | $879.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $372.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $339.2M |
| Q1 26 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.3M | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.2M | $36.0M |
| Q1 26 | $593.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $588.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $568.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $538.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $543.7M | $815.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $518.6M | $786.2M |
| Q1 26 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $879.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4B | $852.6M |
| Q1 26 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 38.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $129.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $34.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $34.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 121.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 129.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.2% | 39.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.64× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
