vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP (CPF) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.9M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.3× Nano Dimension Ltd.). CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs -171.1%, a 199.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Central Pacific Bank (CPB) is an American regional commercial bank located throughout the state of Hawaii.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
CPF vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.9M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $20.7M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 28.4% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $72.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.4M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $28.4M |
| Q1 26 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $-79.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | -279.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.42 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $76.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $593.9M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $7.5B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $231.8M |
| Q1 26 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $593.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $588.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $568.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $538.4M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $543.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $518.6M | $870.3M |
| Q1 26 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4B | $911.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.5M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $-30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.4M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 121.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 129.2% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
