vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (CPRX) and ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. (EPRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($158.8M vs $152.6M, roughly 1.0× CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs 34.5%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (24.5% CAGR vs 20.6%).
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company based in Coral Gables, Florida, United States. The company develops medicines for rare diseases, including the phosphate salt of amifampridine for the treatment of Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). The drug is referred to under the trade name Firdapse, which was approved by the FDA for approved use in children 6 years and older with LEMS in addition to the prior approval for use in adults with LEMS on November 28, 2018. Fir...
Essential Properties Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net-leased commercial properties across the United States. Its assets primarily cover essential service-oriented sectors including casual dining, automotive services, medical clinics, early childhood education centers and light industrial facilities, with tenants mostly holding robust long-term operating track records.
CPRX vs EPRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.6M | $158.8M |
| Net Profit | $52.7M | $60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 82.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 40.5% | 56.5% |
| Net Margin | 34.5% | 37.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 22.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.8% | 6.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.40 | $0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $158.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $152.6M | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.4M | $144.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.6M | $137.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.4M | $129.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.8M | $119.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.7M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.7M | $109.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.7M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.8M | $65.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.1M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.9M | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.9M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $51.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 85.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 84.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 87.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.5% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | 64.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.2% | 64.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.8% | 61.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.3% | 66.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.2% | 61.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.6% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.4% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.2% | 47.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.40 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.33 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $709.2M | $15.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $954.3M | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $709.2M | $60.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $689.9M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $652.8M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.7M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.6M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $442.3M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $375.7M | $23.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $954.3M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $920.2M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $856.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.3M | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $727.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.9M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $608.7M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $971.9M | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $908.9M | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.4M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $772.0M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.4M | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $44.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $44.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $381.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.3M | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $77.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $308.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.9M | $73.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.1M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 5.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.37× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.27× | 5.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CPRX
| Firdapse | $97.6M | 64% |
| Agamree | $35.3M | 23% |
| Fycompa | $19.6M | 13% |
EPRT
| Rental revenue 1,2 | $149.4M | 94% |
| Other | $8.6M | 5% |
| Other revenue | $779.0K | 0% |
