vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Cintas (CTAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.0× Cintas). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 17.7%, a 26.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 9.3%). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($864.0M vs $425.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
CQP vs CTAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $495.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 23.4% |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $491.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $448.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $463.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $448.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $414.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.0M | $397.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $200.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $10.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $138.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $243.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $342.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.0M | $128.5M |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $9.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $531.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | $425.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | 15.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | $1.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $531.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $635.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $441.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $466.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $669.0M | $657.1M |
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $521.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $522.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $373.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $591.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.0M | $550.1M |
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.6% | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.98× | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |