vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO (GPK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.4× GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 3.4%, a 40.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Graphic Packaging International is a Fortune 500 corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It designs and manufactures packaging solutions for commercial products. GPI manufactures paperboard and folding cartons for a wide range of popular consumer goods, particularly beverages and packaged food. The company operates paperboard mills in Kalamazoo, Michigan; Macon, Georgia; Middletown, Ohio; Prosperity, South Carolina; Texarkana, Texas; and West Monroe, Louisiana, that use recycled...
CQP vs GPK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $71.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.1% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | -48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $104.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $165.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.0M | $165.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $261.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $11.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $261.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.0M | $136.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $11.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $521.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | 7.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $521.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $-174.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $489.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $669.0M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 7.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | -1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.98× | 0.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
GPK
| Americas Paperboard Packaging | $1.4B | 68% |
| Other | $667.0M | 32% |
