vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.3× Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 1.4%, a 42.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 0.1%). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($864.0M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
CQP vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.0M | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.0M | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $669.0M | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.0M | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.6% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.98× | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |